tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4024341463089279796.post6712370126904734057..comments2023-09-10T00:44:30.408-07:00Comments on FAUXRUMORS: Todays Slate/PredictionsFAUX RUMORShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00403913043629362701noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4024341463089279796.post-14556118466804040432007-10-22T04:22:00.000-07:002007-10-22T04:22:00.000-07:001) Thanks for your concern Shuck. We didn't expec...1) Thanks for your concern Shuck. We didn't expect our bi weekly prediction post would elicit a huge response, but from looking at the counter traffic is as busy as before, thanks.<BR/>2) As for your question, ironically we ARE working on a rumor post. Not sure if it will be out today or tomorrow. As always stay tuned!FAUX RUMORShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00403913043629362701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4024341463089279796.post-16034023128169198162007-10-22T04:19:00.000-07:002007-10-22T04:19:00.000-07:00Looks like things are pretty slow over here Faux? ...Looks like things are pretty slow over here Faux? No one seems to be playing along<BR/><BR/>I knew things were getting lame. Thats why I haven't been posting here as much. What no rumors to pass along anymore?shuck-a-luckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07109275479344815287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4024341463089279796.post-62758893786685520402007-10-21T11:29:00.000-07:002007-10-21T11:29:00.000-07:001) The results: Chicago @ Toronto: Maple Leafs WRO...1) The results:<BR/> Chicago @ Toronto: Maple Leafs WRONG<BR/><BR/>Buffalo @ Montreal: Canadiens CORRECT<BR/><BR/>Florida @ Ottawa: Senators (Our lock of the night!)CORRECT<BR/><BR/>Edmonton @ Calgary: Flame CORRECT<BR/>NYR @ Boston @ Rangers WRONG<BR/><BR/>New Jersey @ NYI: Devils WRONG<BR/><BR/>Carolina @ Philly: Philly CORRECT<BR/><BR/>Pittsburgh @ Washington: Caps WRONG<BR/><BR/>Atlanta @ TB: Tampa Bay CORRECT<BR/><BR/>Anaheim @ Dal: Dallas CORRECT<BR/><BR/>Minnesota @ St. Louis: Wild CORRECT<BR/><BR/>Detroit @ Phoenix: RedWings CORRECT<BR/><BR/>Nashville @ SJ: Sharks CORRECT<BR/>2) Thats 9 of 13 for a winning % of .692<BR/>3) Add that to our previous 6-3 we are now 15 correct and 7 wrong for a batting average of .682. Not shabby!FAUX RUMORShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00403913043629362701noreply@blogger.com